Search: Site   Web
Data Geek ~ Perry Swanson dives into data that reveal insights about the Pikes Peak region

How to track what El Paso County lawmakers are doing in Denver

January 21st, 2010, 11:07 am by Perry Swanson

denvercapMy colleague Tom Roeder, fresh on the state Legislature beat, is maintaining a great list of all the bills El Paso County’s delegation are proposing at the Statehouse in Denver.

This is the nuts and bolts of governing — important stuff and a great way to keep up to speed on what your representatives are doing. The first five bills on the list:

SAY HELLO TO HIS LITTLE FRIEND: Sen. Dave Schultheis’ SB92 creates a state loophole in federal weapons laws that now regulate machine guns and other types of rifles and pistols. The bill  “exempts from federal laws and regulations all firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition that are manufactured in Colorado by persons who are not federally licensed and that are sold and remain in Colorado.”

PLATES FOR WAR VETS: Rep. Dennis Apuan’s bill, HB1139, would allow veterans with proof of service in Iraq or Afghanistan since 2001 to pay a $25 one-time fee to get custom plates acknowledging their overseas service. Money raised by the extra fee would go to the Colorado Veterans Trust Fund.

SCHOOL CASH ON THE WEB: Rep. Amy Stephens’ SB91 would require school districts and charter schools to post financial information online. They would have to create a database including income and expenses.

VETERANS COURTS EXPANDED: Rep. Marsha Looper’s HB1104 would allow creation of special veterans courts that would allow vets charged with nonviolent crimes to get substance abuse and metal health treatment rather than jail time.

SUBPOENAS MADE EASY: Rep. Bob Gardener’s HB1132 would allow police to serve subpoenas for business records at a time deemed convenient by the business rather than during “normal business hours” as is now required by law.

Check who represents you by entering your ZIP code at Project Vote Smart. And remember to check out what’s happening in the U.S. Congress at The Gazette’s Congress tracker page, and follow all our politics coverage.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon

Colorado unlikely to get new seat in Congress after 2010

January 20th, 2010, 11:27 am by Perry Swanson

The grand civics exercise called the U.S. Census will start in March and carry huge implications for the future of Colorado. Observers can probably check one implication off the list, though: This state is unlikely to get a new seat in the U.S. Congress this time around, according to some experts.

A national census is conducted once a decade to count of everyone who lives in the country. The main purpose is set out in the Constitution, which calls for an enumeration every 10 years to determine how many representatives each state gets in the U.S. House. The number of House members is fixed at 435, so a state where the population declines or remains steady is at risk of losing representatives after each census, while a state with a rapidly growing population is likely to gain more representation.

Colorado’s population increased considerably since the last census in 2000, from 4.3 million to 5 million in 2009, according to the latest estimates. But the increase probably wasn’t enough to call for a new representative in the House. For now, Colorado has seven representatives, including Doug Lamborn, who represents the Pikes Peak region as part of the state’s 5th Congressional District.

Two studies released last month, after the U.S. Census Bureau issued its 2009 population estimates, suggest Colorado will stay at seven representatives after 2010.

William Frey, a demographer for the Brookings Institution think tank, figures Texas will gain four representatives for a total of 36 after the next census. Other states will gain one apiece including Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah and Washington. Meanwhile, Frey projects Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania will each lose one representative, and Ohio will lose two.

Clark Bensen at Polidata, a political data analysis company, offered exactly the same projection in a different study issued in late December.

Neither study predicted Colorado would gain or lose a seat. That was pretty much in line with a 2005 examination by the Indiana Business Research Center, which further predicted Colorado’s number of representatives will say the same at least through 2030.

Here’s a map detailing how many representatives each state has now.

congressmap1

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon

Five candidates take no-earmark pledge, advocacy group says

January 19th, 2010, 11:34 am by Perry Swanson

Five candidates to represent Colorado in the U.S. Congress and Senate have promised not to pursue or support earmarks if they’re elected, the advocacy group Americans for Prosperity said in a press release issued today.

Earmarks are a touchy subject in Washington. Here’s the definition, according to the White House Office of Management and Budget: “Earmarks are funds provided by the Congress for projects, programs, or grants where the purported congressional direction (whether in statutory text, report language, or other communication) circumvents otherwise applicable merit-based or competitive allocation processes, or specifies the location or recipient, or otherwise curtails the ability of the executive branch to manage its statutory and constitutional responsibilities pertaining to the funds allocation process.”

Americans for Prosperity says the people who took its no-earmark pledge include U.S. Senate candidates Jane Norton, Cleve Tidwell and Ken Buck, 4th Congressional District candidate Cory Gardner and 7th Congressional District candidate Jimmy Lakey. Others could sign later.

The pledge reads as follows:

“Earmarking” is a process used by members of Congress in both political parties to redirect taxpayer funds to identified projects without going through a rigorous merit review process. The practice of earmarking has increasingly contributed to misuse, fraud and abuse in the federal budgeting process and wastes the hard-earned money of working families in Colorado.

I, ______, a member of/candidate for the U.S. Congress from Colorado do hereby pledge to my constituents that I will refuse to seek or support earmarks during the Congressional appropriations process through the end of the 112 th Session of Congress in 2012.

If people who made the pledge are elected, and if they keep their word, it would be quite a departure from the practice of some who represent Colorado in Washington. A database of earmarks maintained by the Center for Responsive Politics and Taxpayers for Common Sense shows several Colorado representatives brought home a lot of bacon for their state. In fact, Doug Lamborn, who represents a congressional district that includes the Pikes Peak region, was tops among Colorado’s delegation for earmarks last year. He sponsored or co-sponsored earmarks worth $21.7 million.

Unfortunately, the database has no information on four of Colorado representatives, including Democrats Jared Polis, Betsy Markey and Michael Bennet, and Republican Mike Coffman. Here are links to pages with details about the other representatives, followed by a graph showing their total earmarks for federal fiscal year 2009. Note Sen. Mark Udall’s entry isn’t a typo — the database indicates he had zero earmarks that year. Also, remember to keep track of what’s happening in Washington with The Gazette’s Congress page.

Rep. Diana DeGette, D
Rep. Doug Lamborn, R
Rep. John Salazar, D
Rep. Ed Perlmutter, D
Sen. Mark Udall, D

graph3

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon

Corporate tax break costs Colorado $20 million a year, study says

January 18th, 2010, 3:15 pm by Perry Swanson

studybuddyColorado’s state government is missing out on $20 million a year because of a corporate tax break that lawmakers could discontinue, says a new study from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

An excerpt from the study:

The federal government created this tax break, known as the “domestic production deduction” in 2004. Since most states base their own tax codes on the federal tax code, the tax break was carried over into many states without specific legislative scrutiny or a vote. Now it is costing not only the federal government but also 25 states a large, and growing, amount of money. By 2011, it will cost these states over $500 million per year.

The deduction — enacted as section 199 of the federal Internal Revenue Code — allows companies to claim a tax deduction based on profits from “qualified production activities,” a sweeping category that goes well beyond manufacturing to include such diverse activities as food production film-making and utilities — a substantial share of states’ corporate income tax base. …

States are not required to allow this deduction. Since 2008, Connecticut, New York, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia have joined 18 other states in disallowing the deduction and thereby reducing their current budget shortfalls and benefiting their states’ economies. But another 25 states continue to permit it. (Four states lack personal and corporate income taxes and so are unaffected.) If they continue to do so, a conservative estimate suggests the tax break will cost those states almost $505 million in 2011.

The center estimates discontinuing the deduction in Colorado would yield $20 million a year, which wouldn’t nearly close the budget gap in this state, but it could make a difference in some areas.

As usual, I make no endorsement on whether discontinuing the deduction is the right way to go. Some would view it as a tax increase that worsens business conditions in the state. Others would argue keeping the deduction is a form of corporate welfare. Please debate the merits in the comments section of this blog.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon

Infection rates in Colorado Springs hospitals in line with national average

January 15th, 2010, 2:37 pm by Perry Swanson
mask_03

Trust him. He's a doctor.

Colorado Springs hospitals and other health care facilities are about average when it comes to infections caused during procedures such as coronary artery bypass surgery, according to a report released today by the state Department of Public Health and Environment.

The report details infections caused during a variety of procedures for every facility statewide that performs those procedures — 123 hospitals and other health care providers. Reporting is required under a 2006 state law. The latest figures cover Aug. 1, 2008, to July 31, 2009.

Penrose-St. Francis Health Services reported five infections among 371 hip replacement procedures during that time at its main location on North Nevada Avenue, according to the report. At the north Penrose hospital location, on Woodmen Road, there were 135 hip-replacement procedures and three infections.

Infection rates were similar at Memorial Hospital Central on East Boulder Street near downtown, where 420 hip replacement procedures were performed and six people suffered infection. At Memorial Hospital North on Briargate Parkway, there was one infection among 88 hip replacement procedures.

Researchers used the number of infections and account for other factors to come up with a standardized infection rate, which puts Penrose-St. Francis and Memorial at roughly the same infection rate as the nationwide average.

The researchers judged infection rates at Colorado Springs hospitals to be similar to the national average by all but two measurements: inpatient herniorrhaphy procedures at the main campus of Penrose-St. Francis Health Services, and outpatient herniorrhaphy procedures at Memorial Hospital Central. Herniorrhaphy is a surgical procedure to repair a hernia.

Surgeons performed the inpatient procedure 85 times at Penrose-St. Francis during the study period, and six people got infected. The report says that makes the infection worse than the national average, the report said. The outpatient procedure was done 624 times at Memorial Hospital Central, and 11 people got infected, also worse than the national average.

The report doesn’t tell the outcome of the infections, but it says certain procedures were selected for tracking because “most (infections) from these types of surgeries can be prevented by following established prevention techniques, easily be detected and reported accurately and have a devastating impact on the patient’s quality of life.”

Infection rates are just one way of judging the quality of care at a health care facility. I’m no expert in the subject, but I’m guessing if you’ve read this far you at least have an interest in it. Please share in the comments section what strategies you recommend for identifying the quality of care at a hospital or other provider.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon

Elementary school students get the census low-down

January 15th, 2010, 12:09 pm by Perry Swanson

censusThe children at Helen Hunt Elementary today seemed to be well-schooled in the nation’s once-a-decade headcount of its residents.

They knew the census surveys coming in March are the United States’ only official count of who lives here, and they knew the numbers that result from the census guide government spending decisions on everything from schools to entertainment venues. U.S. Census Bureau workers and volunteers tried to reinforce those points during an event for fourth- and fifth-graders at the school, one of many going on across the nation as part of the Census 2010 Portrait of America Road Tour.

It’s important to know how many people are in each state, and whether the population is going up or down, said Dreson Scruggs, a 10-year-old fifth-grader at Hunt. Dreson’s teacher, Holly Haycraft, said she used census materials in her class to teach math. One exercise involved each student creating a fictional character, and the students used data about the characters to understand the needs of a make-believe community where all of them live.

Hunt Elementary was the only stop on the road tour in Colorado Springs. Deborah Muehleisen, who works for the bureau’s Denver Regional Census Center, said she picked Hunt, at 917 E. Moreno Ave., because it’s in a neighborhood where response rates were relatively low for the 2000 census surveys.

“When you get kids excited about something, they take that to their parents,” Muehleisen said.

Census surveys containing 10 questions will go to every household in the nation during March and April. A response is required by law, and people who don’t respond will get a visit from census workers. The U.S. Census Bureau keeps responses private, another requirement of federal law. Census figures were the basis for $430.6 billion in federal spending nationwide in 2008, including $4.2 billion in Colorado, according a December study by the Brookings Institution think tank.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon

Females lead males in high school graduation

January 14th, 2010, 11:06 am by Perry Swanson

Females graduated high school last year at a rate considerably higher than males throughout Colorado and in most El Paso County school districts, according to figures the state Department of Education released Wednesday.

The female graduation rate in Colorado Springs School District 11, the largest district in El Paso County, was 73 percent. The male graduation rate in D-11 was 7 points lower, at 66 percent. It’s a similar story in Academy School District 20, where the graduation rate last year was 94.3 percent for females and 89 percent for males.

The spread between females and males isn’t new — I found similar inequities in a look at the past four years worth of data. Statewide, the female graduation rate last year was 78 percent, and the male rate was 71.4 percent.

The dynamic didn’t hold, though, for four out of the 15 school districts in El Paso County. Males graduated at higher rates than females in Calhan RJ-1, Ellicott 22, Peyton 23JT and Miami/Yoder 60JT. Each of those districts has a very small student population, so they’re more apt to have dramatic swings in the data from year to year.

The table below shows the female and male graduation rates for each district last year.

Gazette education reporter Sue McMillin broke down some of the numbers about graduation rates in a report in today’s paper, which noted “Colorado Springs School District 11 was among a handful of Colorado districts singled out Wednesday for kudos as the state released last year’s high school graduation rates. D-11’s rate rose 2.7 percent, significantly above the statewide 0.7 percent increase.”

District

Female graduation rate 2009

Male graduation rate 2009

CALHAN RJ-1

82.6

100.0

HARRISON 2

68.7

60.5

WIDEFIELD 3

87.1

79.0

FOUNTAIN 8

90.8

84.7

COLORADO SPRINGS 11

73.0

66.0

CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN 12

95.2

93.7

MANITOU SPRINGS 14

92.2

85.9

ACADEMY 20

94.3

89.0

ELLICOTT 22

87.0

96.0

PEYTON 23 JT

93.8

100.0

HANOVER 28

90.0

81.8

LEWIS-PALMER 38

96.1

94.0

FALCON 49

85.9

76.9

EDISON 54 JT

93.3

75.0

MIAMI/YODER 60 JT

88.9

93.8

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon

Colorado is tops in the mountain west for bank robberies

January 13th, 2010, 4:40 pm by Perry Swanson

Thieves struck Colorado banks 36 times from July 1 to Sept. 30 last year, according to data the FBI released this week.

The incidents included 35 robberies and 1 burglary, the FBI said. The difference between robbery and burglary is subtle — I blogged about it back in December.

The data don’t offer much detail about what happened in Colorado, so I’m limiting my blog about it to only a few sentences. Colorado had the highest number of robberies and burglaries among states in the mountain west, the FBI said. Details are in the graph below.

graph2

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon

Check out our new database of fatal traffic wrecks

January 13th, 2010, 11:16 am by Perry Swanson

auto_rally__7_Each January, or thereabouts, The Gazette produces a report on fatal traffic wrecks in El Paso County during the past year. It’s among the more grim reports we give our audience in an effort to offer insights into life in the Pikes Peak region.

The presentation this year will includes an online, searchable database and map of all the fatal wrecks in 2009. I created the database structure, and reporters Carlyn Ray Mitchell and Maria St. Louis-Sanchez are working on a story examining what happened. The database is still under construction, but check it out if you get a chance and let me know if you see anything that should change.

The Gazette made similar maps in 2008, 2007 and previous years. The idea this year is to build a database that we can use in all subsequent years, and maybe even build in some data from the past. As all data geeks know, when you can look at data trends over time, sometimes it’s possible to see opportunities to improve safety.

Government officials responsible for road maintenance take this information seriously, as I learned from reporting a story way back on Feb. 2, 2004. Read the story after the jump.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon

Feds give $18.7 million to Colorado families for home heating costs

January 12th, 2010, 4:03 pm by Perry Swanson
fire

The LIHEAP program keeps the home fires burning.

The federal government is cutting loose an additional $1.2 billion for a program that helps people pay for household energy costs, including $18.7 million for families in Colorado.

The Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) is designed to help families pay for part of the cost of heating and cooling their homes. States set their own eligibility criteria, and in Colorado the income threshold is $3,400 per month for a household of four people. The sign-up period runs from Nov. 1 to April 30, and so far 64,057 households statewide are getting help from the program this season. That includes 7,899 households in El Paso County, where the average benefit is $427.

Colorado’s extra allocation is a considerable boost over what the state normally receives. The state got $71.6 million for the 2009 fiscal year, so the extra money represents a boost of 26 percent.

The program is administered by the federal Department of Health and Human Services.

“HHS is releasing such a large allocation of LIHEAP funds now in order to ensure that states have resources available to support their energy assistance programs as the weather turns colder and the nation faces high unemployment rates,” the department said in a news release.

Details about applying for help are here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site